By You might be asking yourself, “What exactly is a guru?” This might be a good time to reevaluate your definition.
For a long time, I had been using guru as a synonym for religious or philosophical leader. I think it is now a little more correct to say that a “guys” is someone who can teach you something as a result of giving them a huge helping of their time or energy.
I think the definition of a guru has changed a lot. There is no reason to think that a man who can teach you something through a lot of time or who is willing to give you their time and energy (or both) is a guru. In fact, I don’t necessarily agree with the “gurus” who are so eager to share their knowledge, whether it is through writing books, giving talks, or taking online classes.
Gurus are people who are so eager to share their knowledge and wisdom that they are willing to give it away for free or in exchange for money. Gurus are usually men, as though because they are men, they can teach more knowledge than women can. In this sense, they are similar to the gurus who can do magic or make or take or perform miracles.
Yes, I agree with many people who say that the most valuable thing we can learn, or at least be exposed to, is the art of getting what we want. But as many other writers and philosophers have said, we should always be looking for the most effective way to accomplish that goal. That means we should always be willing to pay good money for the information we need to get what we want. I think there are some important differences between the two approaches.
One is to look for the most effective way to accomplish what we want. The other is to just look, and not be concerned with what works or not.
I’ve been talking with a group of friends lately and I’ve noticed that my friends are always interested in the latest in technology and how to get what you want. I’ve noticed, however, that they are always interested in getting what they want. This has lead me to believe that they are interested in getting what they need. I’ve noticed, however, that they are always interested in getting what they want.
This is one of those things I can believe and yet still not understand. It seems to me that they just want what is “good”, what they want, and that they want it. As if there are more important things to do than just look and be happy, that they have to have that “good” look and that “good” life.
I get the feeling kumar wants something that is good for him to look and be happy. Maybe he just wants to be happy. There is no doubt that he is happy, and he is happy with who he is.
As it turns out, the only thing kumar wants is what he wants. And that is to be a good person, for him and for others. But if he wants something bad, what is he going to do? If he wants to be a bad person, how can he be happy? I can’t help but feel a bit of pity for him.
Comments